Many women (and men) have not realized or simply do not care that discrimination in their favour has degenerated into an unqualified assault on the civil status of men and boys. Denial of the rights of men is not the natural, unavoidable and irrevocable consequence of the recognition of women’s rights which do not exist in lieu of and cannot be gained in exchange for the surrender of the rights of men. The inferior civil status of men is marked at the most basic level by scant and hopelessly inadequate government provision of emergency legal and financial assistance, whereas government and privately funded health, education, employment and housing programmes among others provided specifically for women and girls proliferate. Resentment, the full extent and intensity of which remains to be seen is being stored up by men in general and by fathers, husbands and common law spouses in particular who without any statutory legal redress despair of the transparently biased rulings made by family and divorce courts in flagrant breech of their parental and property rights. No doubt as the number of cases increases, so will the number of women who unhappily discover that it is plainly not in their interests to have their fathers, husbands, brothers and sons demoralized and impoverished as a result of the rough justice routinely meted out to men by the law courts.

​

In the prevailing political climate the value and extent of the positive contributions men make to society are largely ignored, if not openly and disingenuously denigrated. It remains to be seen how that is possible when towns, cities, industrial and transport infrastructure, the steel and concrete fabric of the built environment in which we live is and has always been almost entirely planned and constructed by men who from time to time are maimed or killed in the process. A simple weighing up of just a few ripe facts makes it clear that evidence for a better life lived by men is hard to find because it is ‘third wave’ dyke propaganda and does not exist. More men than women commit suicide. More men are victims of violent assault. More men are homeless. More men die in accidents at work. More men suffer chronic illness. More men suffer neglect in old age. Men have shorter life expectancy than women. Men are routinely denied custody of and access to their children by divorce and family courts. Men convicted of crimes receive longer sentences than women convicted of the same crimes. Men receive custodial sentences for committing the same crimes as women who receive non-custodial sentences. Men are paroled from prison later and less frequently than women. Men (and boys) are conscripted to kill and die in war they neither make nor want to fight. Women of course are not, at least not yet.

 

In 1999 Time Magazine listed Emmeline Pankhurst as one of the hundred most important people of the 20th century declaring that, “She shaped an idea of women for our time; she shook society into a new pattern from which there could be no going back.” However, the image of the fearless crusader for women’s rights those words were no doubt intended to invoke is not consistent with the historical record. Despite founding the Women’s Social and Political Union (in 1898), Emmeline Pankhurst was not and never could have been a paragon of English womanhood and selfless social reformer in the cause of women’s political enfranchisement simply because the world renowned suffragist was a man. He was not a proto-feminist heroine in a crusade for social justice, nor were his four ‘adopted’ crypto male to female transgender sons. Pankhurst was nothing if not a staunch and vociferous supporter of the political establishment and jealously guarded his privileged position and influence within it. Predictably his name is not, but ought to be mud to those whose great and great, great grandfathers died (900,000) or were maimed and blinded in their hundreds of thousands, cannon fodder in The Great War in which neither Pankhurst or his sons were in any danger of being conscripted to fight and like the elite cabalist and Sabbatean overlords (on both sides) who engineered it, arrogantly expected millions of politically disenfranchised, but honour bound working-class men (and boys) to do their patriotic duty to ‘King and Country’ by fighting and dying in it.

​

The Women’s Social and Political Union became notorious when its activists smashed windows, committed arson and assaulted policemen. As a result Pankhurst and his sons served repeated, but short prison sentences ironically in Holloway women’s prison in London during which they staged hunger strikes in order that they should be cast as heroic champions of women’s suffrage in the mode of a passion play undoubtedly contrived with the connivance of their severely pathologically maladjusted, if not criminally insane crypto female to male transgender and homosexual freemason task masters entrenched at the highest levels of the establishment. Unlike a significant number of women from the WSPU rank and file who were also on hunger strike, the elevated social status of Pankhurst and his sons ensured they were not subjected to forced feeding by criminally culpable prison doctors or random assault meted out by beligerent warders. In stark contrast to the legions of men and boys who would be killed in The Great War, the survival of Pankhurst, his sons and other WSPU hunger strikers was of course a foregone conclusion. When the government declared war, Pankhurst demanded that all fit young men join the fight and called an immediate moratorium on suffrage activism, urging women to aid industrial production. Clearly, many millions of women have been and still are disappointingly credulous adherents to fraudulent feminist dogma (and the pernicious programme of social engineering promulgated by it) conceived in the delusional minds of men who secretly and compulsively pose as women. That there should be so many prominent and influential crypto male to female transgender impostors at the forefront of the women’s rights movement a century later is not an accident of history.

 

In August 1914, less than a month after the british government declared war on Germany, retired Vice-Admiral Charles Penrose Fitzgerald (a vociferous proponent for the introduction of mandatory military service) established the White Feather Brigade whose rank and file consisted of suffragists who like Penrose were in no danger of being killed, maimed or suffering the extreme psychological trauma inflicted on the soldiers in the field who ate, slept and died in their hundreds of thousands among rats and decomposing corpses in stinking mud and faeces filled trenches. Calculated to shame men into enlisting in the army, the crude and devisive campaign strategy adopted by the ‘Brigade’ was ruthlessly carried out by groups of suffragists who roamed the streets, haranguing and vilifying as cowards, not only unsuspecting men they encountered wearing civilian clothes (who ironically in many instances, like the women they were confronted by were not eligible to vote), but also boys too young to volunteer to join the army who the suffragists presented with white feathers intended to signify the cowardice of the recipients. Some of the men insulted in this way were infirm and disqualified from enlisting, while others were employed in essential professions. Many soldiers not in uniform, back in England on furlough or to receive treatment for ‘shell shock’ and others recovering from their wounds before being sent back to the battle front or too seriously injured (often poisoned by chlorine gas) to return to the ranks did not escape the public humiliation of the White Feather Brigade.

​

In January 1916, as a result of the enormous and rapidly mounting number of casualties among the soldiers at the front and in order to compensate for what the army chiefs of staff concluded was an insufficient number of men volunteering to enlist, the british government passed the Military Service Act subjecting single men aged eighteen to forty to conscription unless they were widowed with children or ministers of a religion. The following March the provisions of the Act were amended to include the induction of married men into the ranks. By the war’s end in 1918, the age limit for conscripts had been raised to fifty one. In these oppressive circumstances, tens of thousands of ambivalent conscripts reluctantly chose to take their chances in the trenches rather than be imprisoned for at least the duration of the war and have their family members ostracized, abused and in some instances subjected to assault at the hands of malicious and hostile neighbours. Conscientious objectors refusing to fight on moral, religious or political grounds were guaranteed a prison sentence and roundly condemned by suffragists who were firmly and unappologetically allied with the rabid warmongers in the military and political establishment. However, almost to a man ‘conchies’ elected to become medical orderlies in the field who although not engaged in combat endured the same appalling conditions as the soldiers they administered to and in the course of carrying out their unenviable duties many of them were killed or wounded.

​

LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ proponents assert that there is a tendency far more pronounced among heterosexual men and boys than among heterosexual women and girls to ‘homophobia’ which in the case of men they claim typically manifests as acts of violence perpetrated against homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders. Not suprisingly this claim has much in common with the tendentious assertion by radical feminists that so-called gender violence (which of course heterosexual women, lesbians, homosexuals and transgenders do not commit) is running rampant and unchecked throughout society as if women, transgenders and homosexual men are in constant danger of random violent or sexual assault (or both at the hands of enraged heterosexual men) or who are at least severely inhibited in their daily lives by the threat of it. Proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project communicate their false solidarity and claim common cause with women by screaming hysterically about the single most important grievance they can claim to share not only with their feminist sisters, but with all women who are invited to take it for granted that homosexual men, women and transgenders are not violent and face a common threat from heterosexual men who are. To keep women on side, LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ proponents insinuate that heterosexual men are a threat to society (absent among homosexual men, ‘toxic masculinity’ is inexplicably widespread among heterosexual men and boys) and must be feminized in order to ameliorate the danger they present. It is true that in the main homosexual men neither sexually (by definition) nor violently assault women and girls, but it is also true they do plenty of both to boys and each other. No one should be in any doubt that the perpetrators of violent and sexual assault against homosexual men are overwhelmingly other homosexual men.

​

Homosexuals have appropriated and assiduously promote the word gay, the meaning of which every adult knows has nothing whatsoever to do with sexuality. Its use serves to eliminate or suppress negative perceptions, neutralizing any revulsion, disapproval or antipathy felt by heterosexual men and women and is calculated to invoke among children in particular approval for something benign and commendable (although it is not evident exactly what that something is). The word gay is deployed to provide linguistic camouflage for sexual behaviour which is considered by most heterosexual men to be degenerate and morally repugnant despite the propaganda extolling the ‘virtues’ of homosexuality and the risk of being censured by proponents of the LGBTPEDO agenda (as harbouring an attitude which is not ‘politically correct’ and by implication offensive and reprehensible) and also ironically, many gullible and misguided heterosexual women and girls.

​

It should not go unacknowledged that most fathers and grandfathers (who are well aware that it is largely beyond their control) do not want their sons and grandsons (or daughters and grandaughters) to be homosexual (or lesbian), not because they are concerned that their children and grandchildren might be marginalized and suffer social and economic disadvantage at the hands of a disapproving heterosexual majority, but because they quite naturally regard homosexuality as repugnant and notwithstanding in vitro fertilization and surrogacy or adoption, a serious obstacle to their children and grandchildren conceiving children of their own.

​

Heterosexual men in general, in stark contrast to a significantly large number of heterosexual women and girls do not knowingly form friendships, become socially intimate and as far as is practicably possible avoid associating with homosexual men who for the most part feel antipathy for heterosexual men in much the same way, although this does not present itself as a psychological barrier or impediment to the unreciprocated sexual attraction homosexual men feel for heterosexual men who do not want to become the object of or feature in the private sexual fantasies (for which most feel revulsion and disgust) of homosexual men, much less be party to a sexual liaison or relationship with one. It is this knowledge which prompts heterosexual men to avoid or at least minimize social interactions with homosexual men who are acutely sensitve to this and paradoxically feel resentment not for the disinclination of heterosexual men to form friendships with them, but because heterosexual men are sexually unavailable to them. This is of course the unmentionable crux of the matter for which a disappointingly large number of women and girls are at great pains not to recognize and whose disapproval for the disdain and revulsion heterosexual men commonly express among themselves for homosexuality is misguided and would better be directed at many homosexual men (pederasts) who are alive to any opportunity to deceive and manipulate boys too young and immature to be aware or suspect the concealed sexual motivations for the attention paid to them by pederasts who know that young boys do not have the accuity or presence of mind to recognize the threat of sexual predation posed to them and who are not psychologically or physically equipped to forestall.

​

In common with the proponents of radical feminist ideology, proponents of the LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ agenda use ‘weaponized’ language to silence criticism of their social and political aspirations. Widely permeating the mainstream, diseminated and propagated by mass media and now in common use, the big guns in their arsenal of ‘weaponized’ language, the terms ‘homophobic’, ‘transphobic’ and ‘homotransphobic’ are typically used by proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project in disingenuous references to opponents who level criticism for which no effective refutation or counter argument can be offered. The heterosexual individual who refuses to indulge or validate the psychological aberrations and delusions of transgenders is pathologically maladjusted and therefore suffering from the mental disorder of ‘transphobia’. Likewise, the heterosexual individual who regards the sexual orientation of homosexuals as deviant is also pathologically maladjusted, but in that case is suffering from ‘homophobia’. Of course individuals who express revulsion for homosexuality or transgenderism are invariably disapproving of both and ipso facto suffer from ‘homotransphobia’. That being the case, it is hard to see what purpose is served by the other two terms since this third one makes them redundant. However, when this reactionary ‘psychiatric diagnostic methodology’ is stood on its head and applied to homosexuals, lesbians, transgenders, bisexuals, pederasts and paedophiles their shared predispositon to exhibit a deeply ingrained antipathy, if not pathological hostility toward heterosexuals may be reasonably interpreted as being indicative of a state of psychological maladjustment or ‘heterophobia’.

​

‘Weaponized’ terminology is used to disparage and impugn those who have the temerity to challenge LGBTPEDO propaganda which having received the validating endorsement of goverment, mass media and academia has thereby been miraculously invested with an unimpeachable political and moral authority to which any challenge or manifestation of resistance is deemed reprehensible and offensive to public sensibilities and is not therefore ‘politically correct’ thus warranting condemnation and censure in the interests of preventing the corruption of public morals. The expression of dissent in the face of such political and moral authority (the substance, cogency or simple truth of the rhetorical content is arbitrarilly treated as irrelevant and cynically disregarded) is automatically repudiated as ‘hatespeech’ and ipso facto a reckless and anti-social act which must be strenuously suppressed and opponents of the LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ agenda who voice it regarded as socially maladjusted and morally corrupt. In this way, to speak of or write something which is true, but which compromises or is prejudicial to anything receiving government endorsement or sanction becomes an act of sedition, a criminal offence punishable under the law.

​

In the face of the relentless barrage of mind-bending LGBTPEDO propaganda, stating what should be obvious to every sane adult has become a necessity. The vastly overwhelming majority (98%) of the world’s population is and always has been heterosexual. This single undeniable fact unequivocally establishes heterosexuality as the social norm without which human reproduction would not be possible. The ‘weaponized’ term ‘cisgender’, freely bandied about by the proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project has been coined to redefine the heterosexual population in relation to what it is not, that is to say not transgender. In any event the term is superfluous and as yet rarely if ever used by heterosexual men and women to denote or describe themselves. Nevertheless, proponents of the LGBTPEDO agenda would have the heterosexual majority believe that human sexuality should be viewed as a ‘spectrum’ of sexual behaviour in which heterosexuality features as just one of several kinds, intrinsically no different to any other and therefore no better or worse. The term ‘cisgender’ is a pernicious linguistic contrivance, the sole purpose of which is to impose a specious social and moral equivalence by dispensing with the word heterosexual, its distinguishing characteristics and the fundamental reproductive biological imperative pertaining which are the indispensable defining factors by which heterosexuality is commonly understood and establish it as the sexual orientation of the overwhelming majority and social norm. The characterization, repudiation or censure of transgenderism as unnatural or deviant and any other kind of sexual orientation in the ‘spectrum’ of human sexuality concocted by the proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project becomes untenable since the fundamental qualitative differences and distinctions existing between heterosexuality and transgenderism, homosexuality, lesbianism or bisexuality (and pederasty or paedophilia) cannot be drawn, thus paving the way for the acceptance of sexual behaviour which is inimical to normal human sexuality.

​

Figuratively speaking the term ‘hatespeech’ is the last word in ‘weaponized’ language. It is like an Orwellian Newspeak word used to induce at its best effect feelings of revulsion, thoughts of moral reproval, outrage and ultimately censure. The term ‘hatespeech’ is the mental cosh, the verbal blunt instrument wielded against anyone who voices proscribed thoughts and asks inconvenient questions deemed dangerous because they conflict with the prevailing reactionary social orthodoxy which underpins the political dictat of a self-seeking, self-obsessed, pathologically amoral and ruthless patrician class. The term ‘hatespeech’ is employed to discredit dissenters who are indiscriminately condemned as pariahs and commomly characterized as psychologically impaired or socially, even criminally delinquent bigots whose morally degenerate beliefs and convictions must be suppressed. This deliberate and typically crude misrepresentation is demonstrably fallacious and easily refuted, ironically only assuming veracity when used to describe the mentality of those who ply this psychologically punitive device to silence criticism of their counterfeit political mandate and stolen hegemony. This scathing ‘weaponized’ term is most definately not used by anyone genuinely in favour of free-speech, unless of course in the midst of heated argument they feel impelled to point out to their intellectually bankrupt antagonists that truth is not ‘hatespeech’. In Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) versus Whatcott, case number 33676, the Supreme Court of Canada in 2013 asserted, ‘Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. The benefits of the suppression of hate speech (truth) and its harmful effects outweigh the detrimental effect of restricting expression which, by its nature, does little to promote the values underlying freedom of expression.’ Clearly, the claims of the first sentence are specious and reactionary, while the second sentence is part pernicious sophistry and part unintelligible doubletalk.

 

The term ‘hatespeech’ is routinely used to silence anyone who reveals truths which lay bare the perfidy, mendacity and hypocrisy of those grasping and morally corrupt constituencies within society whose reward for their complicity in sustaining state tyranny has been the elevation of their civil status to the level of a privileged social and political class. This wholesale enlistment of favoured constituencies by government falsely lends legitimacy to their devisive claims of entitlement and outrageous self-serving demands for preferential treatment which they continue to receive. Taken together these preferred constituencies who jealously guard their state sanctioned privileges constitute an amorphous vassal class from which ranks the political (and professional) shock-troops of the state apparatus are recruited. It is almost exclusively the role of this class to promulgate and execute the totalitarian programme of social engineering prescribed by their political masters who at the very highest levels are not professional politicians and whose power is far greater. Germany provides a classic example. Despite public condemnation of homosexuality by ‘party’ patrons and prominent ideologues of the Hitler Youth movement, homosexual liaisons were common place if not widespread among its members. Moreover, the leadership of the Sturmabteilung (aka Brown Shirts), the National Socialist party’s ‘private’ militia established in 1921 was exclusively homosexual. No heterosexual recruits among the rank and file membership (which had risen to a remarkable three million men by the time Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933) were ever promoted beyond corporal. Homosexuals and pederasts occupied every rank from sergeant all the way up to and including the militia’s chief of staff. This gives new meaning to the word nazi.

​

The repugnance and widespread contempt felt for LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ ideology among heterosexual men and women who regard it as pernicious and resent having their children indoctrinated with it in schools persists. However, right across the board, magazine, newspaper, online, radio and television news output is saturated with LGBTPEDO propaganda, a mass media campaign in the service of a worldwide social engineering programme the like of which has never been known before. Television news is leading the charge with English language broadcasters in the vanguard. ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX and BBC output among others has matastasized, taking the form of a relentless assault on the minds of unsuspecting viewers who remain ignorant of the fact that they are being subjected to mass psychological conditioning (neurolinguistic progamming) aimed at establishing a collective mind-set sympathetic to the LGBTPEDO social project and who in their millions are astonishingly still unaware that almost all of the news anchors and reporters working for the major television networks are crypto transgenders. Alarmingly, with the connivance of national governments and the United Nations Organization (under the aegis of UN Agenda 21), the LGBTPEDO social project is being fraudulently portrayed as a heroic struggle for human rights in order to provide the political cover essential in a bid to broaden public acceptance of and eventually consolidate universal approval for aberrant, socially undesirable expressions of pathologically amoral and delusional behaviour and deviant sexual practices, effectively transforming vice into virtue by neutralizing moral and ethical resistance to its propagation and eliminating the legal constraints acting upon it. Foremost in this push for the normalization and assimilation of socially corrosive behaviour is the Trojan Horse of universal legalization of so-called same sex marriage which in north America, Europe, the Antipodese, Scandinavia and elsewhere has already taken place.​

​

An extensive study of homosexuality carried out in 1988 and published in the Archives of Sexual Behaviour (one of a raft of studies of the subject which have largely produced the same results) provides damning statistical evidence of the predisposition of homosexual men to pederasty. The study found that 86% of male paedophiles who sexually molest boys describe themselves as homosexual or bisexual. Homosexuals and lesbians (who represent approximately two percent of the population) sexually molest children at a rate twenty times that of heterosexual paedophiles. The Sentinel, one of San Francisco’s newspapers and numerous other publications which have a homosexual readership carry in their classified sections vacation and travel advertisements offering tours in Thailand, the Philippines, Burma, Sri Lanka and various other countries in which child prostitution is rampant, especially that of boys. An editorial piece in The Sentinel brazenly asserted, “The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality.” Spartacus Gay Guides, a travel guide specializing in sex tours provides information on countries where boy prostitutes can be found and lists the legal penalties incurred by individuals convicted of sexual offences against children in those countries. The International Lesbian and Gay Association (which has over 620 affiliate organizations) and the National Coalition of Gay Organizations have both passed policy resolutions in favour of the elimination of laws prescribing a minimum age of sexual consent. As a result of political pressure from the US Congress in 1995, the United Nations Non-Government Organization consultative status of the International Lesbian and Gay Association was rescinded because a number of its affiliate organizations were promoting paedophilia (and continue to do so). In an attempt to secure reinstatement of its NGO consultative status, the International Lesbian and Gay Association expelled the North American Man Boy Love Association (whose membership is comprised of pederasts), but refused to expel a half dozen more paedophile organizations. The UN ban has not been lifted, yet.

​

Inevitably, in the wake of the enactment of so-called same sex marriage legislation another ‘rights’ campaign will be launched, one aimed at achieving a considerable reduction in the age of consent. Presumably, justified by legal precedent based on psychological and clinical assessments made by psychiatrists and medical professionals who have previously affirmed the mental competence of children as young as five who ‘independently ellect’ to undergo something as phisiologically extreme and psychologically far-reaching as so-called gender reassignment, it will be argued that it is reasonble to assume such children are more than competent and well able to understand the gravity of any decision they might make to consent to engage in sexual relations. However, under the rubric of equal rights legislation failure to extend the ‘privilege’ to non-transgender children could be legally construed as unfairly discriminatory, there being no reason to suppose they are not equally competent and on that basis legislation mandating a considerable reduction of the age of consent for all children could be enacted. Consequently, if children are regarded as being sufficiently psychologically and emotionally competent to understand the gravity of any decision they might make to consent to engage in sexual relations, they are by extension competent to consent to featuring in pornography.

​

While the Fortune Five Hundred media and publishing behemoths loudly hawk corporate government propaganda as news, their subsidiaries quietly rake in on their behalf billion dollar profits generated from the international sales and distribution of online (for Google and Yahoo the revenue stream dwarfs all others combined), CD, television and magazine pornography which is warping the minds and contaminating the human spirit of untold millions of chronically addicted men, women and children who psychologically enslaved by its stupifying effects are being desensitized by ever more widely diseminated and increasingly degenerate content. Furthermore, the banking corporations which own the media corporations are busy filling their coffers to overflowing with the ‘fees’ from laundering billion dollar profits generated by international narco, child and sex trafficking, prostitution, arms smuggling, gambling rackets and many other lucrative criminal enterprises besides.

​

There is a continuing and unprecedented increase in the number of divorces between married couples and separations of unmarried heterosexual partners. In both cases a legion of children are being dislodged from their families by the courts and inducted into state ‘childcare’ institutions. The hue and cry which came from LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ proponents for the legalization of so-called same sex marriage (not same gender?) coincided with steeply declining birth and fertility rates (which continue most notably in north America, Europe and Japan) and year on year record numbers of aborted pregnancies and permanently missing children, many of whom after running away from home are abducted and forced into prostitution and the production of pornography. As for the rest, they are stolen from their families primarily for those purposes. Random abductions without doubt account for many disappearances. The proportion of the total number of disappearances such cases represent is of course unknown, but for the number remaining, no matter how large or small that may be, child sex-trafficking (and the clandestine ‘adoption’ of stolen children) is the reason for it. Unmarried individuals with no ‘common law’ spouse or partner, regardless of whether they were men, women, transgender, lesbian, homosexual or heterosexual, traditionally (exceptions were rare) did not qualify and in general did not apply to government registered agencies to become adoptive guardians. The majority of homosexual men are unlikely to be fathers by reason of their sexual orientation (and obviously by not having heterosexual relationships tend not to have children) and rarely take previously conceived children with them to either a subsequent homosexual liaison or so-called same sex marriage because divorce and family courts almost always award custody of children to mothers.

​

In the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, throughout Europe, Scandinavia and elsewhere the major television news networks fall over themselves in the scramble to give air time to any and all proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project. Naturally in this insufferable mass media manufactured clamour, the voices of LGBTPEDO ‘rights’ proponents are always the loudest and longest heard. They gravely expound on the political deficiencies of governments who have as yet not acceded to enact the ‘rights’ legislation they demand. They solemnly extoll the many and varied reasons why society has a moral obligation to relieve the discrimination, humiliation and social stigma suffered by responsible and law-abiding lesbian and homosexual citizens. They bitterly complain of the long and cruel denial of their human rights and speak proudly of their valiant crusade to win social justice and equality under the law. Proponents of the LGBTPEDO social project well understand the radical changes to family law that so-called same sex marriage demands and are acutely aware that the reform of adoption laws is crucial to the furtherance of their social project. Whether married or unmarried, heterosexual unions can and invariably do produce children, whereas lesbian and homosexual couples do not. Surrogacy and in vitro fertilization have long since been widely available to unmarried same sex couples, but adoption has not. Previously reserved for married and unmarried heterosexual couples, full rights of adoption (by far the most common way of becoming a permanent legal guardian of a child) have been extended to lesbian, homosexual and transgender couples under cover of so-called same sex marriage legislation.

​

Heterosexual men and women are being compelled by force of law to submit to the irrational demands of a mentally unhinged and politically dangerous minority whose delusional assertions, given sanction by government have incomprehensibly and against all reason superceded truth and supplanted reality. This deeply disturbing state of affairs where sophistry and legal fiction override fact brings to mind Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty Four in which the socially and politically ‘delinquent’ Winston Smith (who for the purposes of social rehabilitation) is forcibly subjected to psychological re-education (torture and brainwashing) by the state until he finally, while under extreme duress affirms that two plus two equals five. Winston Smith is an inmate and the world in which he lives is an asylum, a place where facts have ceased to be the measure of truth and truth is no longer the means by which reality is defined.

 

There is a growing and for the most part unidentifiable pathologically delusional constituency within society whose very survival depends on the widespread acceptance of the gender inversion of children and the aberrant, socially undesirable behaviour and perverse eugenic ideals associated with it. For a century the bio-mechanical comic book and movie personification of the transhuman has been the android, but the cabalists’ divine being the androgyne (hermaphrodite), not man and machine combined, but man and woman combined is the embodiment of it. On July 19th 2016, the United States government enacted legislation allowing transgenders (female to male and male to female) to enlist in the US army, navy and airforce. The Department of Defense published a ‘sexual identity military manual’ in which it states, “effective immediately, no otherwise qualified service member may be involuntarily separated, discharged or denied re-enlistment or continuation of service solely on the basis of their gender identity.” The manual goes on to relate the official procedure to be followed by any member of the US armed forces who wishes to undergo a so-called sex change operation at government (taxpayer) expense.

​

“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. The family unit, spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants. The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.” The preceding excerpt taken from the article commonly referred to as The Gay Manifesto was written by Michael Swift and published in Gay Community News of February 15th – 21st, 1987 and subsequently entered into the Congressional Record of the United States.

​

Social scientists and feminists have long misrepresented patriarchy as a form of social domination and control of women attributable to the male population as a whole, but close examination and dispassionate analysis of the phenomenon reveals that it has always been engendered and sustained by a pathologically mysoginistic, amoral and utterly ruthless patrician class of crypto female to male transgender (and male to female) impostors, pederasts and homosexual men who occupy the highest offices of the state apparatus, banking, industry, commerce and mass media and in concert secretly operate as a homo-satanic (Sabbatean) ruling cabal by means of a broad coalition of secret societies (a criminal substructure), the worldwide brotherhood of freemasons foremost among them. Moreover, this homo-satanic cult has historically used heterosexual women as a social, economic and political bulwark against the serious existential threat heterosexual men and boys pose to its elaborately camouflaged hegemony. Patriarchy is and always has been the oppressive manifestation of a diabolical world order inflicted on society by this transnational-transgender patrician class (its victims being both male and female) whose paradoxical envy and contempt for the reproductive capacity of women is the impetus which continues to drive its biologists in a frenetic and long standing, but as yet fruitless search for the artificial means by which the reproductive role of women might ultimately be dispensed with.

​

In his book Political Ponerology written in 1984 Andrew M. Lobaczewski warns, “There have always been ‘society pedagogues’ who have become fascinated by their own great ideas, which might sometimes even be true, but are more often constricted or contained by the taint of some hidden pathological thought processes. Such people have always striven to impose pedagogical methods which would impoverish and deform the development of individuals’ and societies’ psychological world view. They inflict permanent harm upon societies, depriving them of universally useful values. By claiming to act in the name of a more valuable idea, such pedagogues actually undermine the values they profess and open the door for desructive ideologies. A hidden network of mutually ramified pathological conspiracies exists. It is a secret criminal substructure which repeatedly produces psychopaths obsessed with dreams of seizing power and imposing their will upon society. Such men, so far removed from the main social structure will always participate in the genesis of that evil which spares no nation. Relentlessly they seek to destroy the structural forms of society worked out by history and replace them with repressive social systems inimical to humankind, systems within which their authority is maintained by force.”
 

The first American Grand Lodge of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry was established in 1717. However in 1848 the establishment by the Rothschilds and Montefiores of B’nai B’rith (Constitutional Grand Lodge of the Order of the Sons of the Covenant aka Blood of the Chosen) which from inception covertly functioned as a secret intelligence gathering agency, control of american freemasonry was no longer in the hands of the anglo-saxon establishment whose legacy it was. Judah P. Benjamin, a British subject, agent of the Rothschild’s and principal founding member who became the first leader of B’nai B’rith was instrumental in the organization’s amalgamation with the Knights of the Golden Circle, another branch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The financial and political reach produced by the amalgamation was long enough not only to provide the planning and logistical foundation for the military training of lodge members and supporters who swelled the ranks of infantrymen enlisted in the Confederate army, but crucially the political leadership of the Confederacy came from among B’nai B’rith’s senior members. During the final phase of the war between the states, Judah P. Benjamin then Secretary of War for the Confederacy was appointed Secretary of State. Before the war the greatest existential threat to the slave states had been slave rebellion and the greatest preoccupation of the governing class was its suppression. Judah P. Benjamin enlisted Confederate army general Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (southern jurisdiction from 1859 until 1891) who significantly was also a Jesuit priest and Dr. Kuttner Baruch (grandfather of Bernard Baruch, anglophile and prominent Wall Street financier) another Rothschild agent and future leader of B’nai B’rith in a plan to establish a paramilitary force whose raison d’etre would be the suppression of slave rebellion and the capture of runaways. These three men in an audacious conspiracy with others planned the assassination of president Abraham Lincoln.

 

John Wilkes Booth, only twenty six years old, but already a 33rd degree freemason was the secret agent charged by the masters of the Knights of the Golden Circle to carry out the mission to kill Lincoln. The cover-up was directed by 33rd degree freemason Edwin Stanton, Lincoln's traitorous Secretary of War who ordered blockades of all the roads out of Washington DC, except for the one that Booth used to escape. Although allegedly killed at the climax of a twelve day chase, Booth in fact made good his getaway and fled to England. A state-wide police and army dragnet delivered eight defendants (Samuel Arnold, George Atzerodt, David Herold, Samuel Mudd, Michael O'Laughlen, Lewis Powell, Edmund Spangler and Mary Surratt) for trial of which four (O'Laughlen, Arnold, Mudd and Spangler) were convicted and sent to prison where in 1867 O'Laughlen died of yellow fever. His surviving counterparts were pardoned in1869 by Lincoln's successor, ex-vice president Andrew Johnson. The other four defendants (Powell, Herold, Atzerodt and Surratt) went to the gallows without rancour and dutifully swung for the sake of Dixie.

 

During the hearings of the military commission examining the circumstances surrounding Lincoln’s assassination convened in Washington DC in May and June 1865, Lord Palmerston, a 33rd degree freemason and british prime minister, Judah P. Benjamin (the ‘voice’ of the London freemason bankers who ordered and financed the assassination) and Jacob Thompson, a former Confederate Secretary for the Interior (who withdrew 180 thousand dollars from the Bank of Montreal in Canada to fund the operation) were all directly implicated in the conspiracy. The upshot was the Knights of the Golden Circle were exposed, so they changed their name and became the Ku Klux Klan. In any event, Lincoln's assassination saw the Confederacy on its knees. By then, beleaguered and in ruins the South was as good as beaten, its decimated army near dead on its feet so long in retreat before the advancing legions of its mortal enemy and the promise of a crushing defeat. The assassination of president Lincoln was on its face the defining act in the life of John Wilkes Booth whose name and reputation would thereafter live on in infamy. A diminutive, energetic figure (just over five feet six inches tall) with whiskers, Booth was in fact a female eonist (crypto transgender) who jealously guarded not only the secrets of a high ranking freemason, but also carefully concealed her female identity by effecting a virile masculine persona with the skill of the accomplished actress she was.
 

In his book Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry published in 1871, Albert Pike reveals that freemasonry “conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled; to conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it. Truth is not for those who are unworthy or unable to receive it, or would pervert it.” Pike goes on to write that a low ranking freemason “is intentionally misled by false interpretations (of masonic symbols). It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry.” He continues, “What the Chiefs of the Order really believed and taught is indicated to the Adepts by the hints contained in the high degrees of Free-masonry.” Pike further explains that “The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning. They rather conceal than disclose the Truth. They hint it only.” He states that an initiate “commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life.” Pike twice iterates that phallic worship is a fundamental part of the “Ancient Mysteries of Freemasonry” and refering to the initiation of a new member writes, ”he mingles with the crowd of Initiates, and crowned with flowers, celebrates with them the holy orgies.” Clearly antipathetic to women, freemasonry is secretly approving of homosexuality. Carl Claudy, New York Herald journalist, 33rd degree member of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and author cryptically states in his book Introduction to Freemasonry that “The real secrets of Masonry are never told, not even mouth to ear. For the real secret of Masonry is spoken to your heart, and from it to that of your brother (freemason). Never the language made for tongue may speak it; it is uttered only in the language of the eye, in those manifestations of that love which a man has for his friend, which passeth all other loves, even that of woman.” In his book Albert Pike cryptically asserts, “The love of woman cannot die out; and it has a terrible and uncontrollable fate.”
 

This homo-satanic cult and its criminal proxies have established or covertly subverted every political, financial, legal, medical, educational, social, military, religious, commercial, scientific and art institution in its relentless pursuit of the absolute psychological and physical enslavement of the people of the world. Rothschild, Warburg, Sassoon, Schiff, Mellon, Baruch, Harriman, Montefiore, Oppenheimer and Rockefeller are just a few of the names of the banking family dynasties, overlords and inheritors of a luciferian creed conceived by pharisaic cabalists who early surmised that by arrogating to themselves a monopoly to create money as debt (the Money Power) the world and everything in it would three millenia hence belong to their heirs who for at least the last two hundred years have been the primary sponsors and often intermarried financial patrons of the royal houses of Europe and beyond.

​

In Tales of the British Aristocracy published in 1957, L. G. Pine (editor of Burkes Peerage) writes, "Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also." In 1812, on his deathbed in Frankfurt, Germany, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s infamous last words to his sons  were, “Remember my children, all the earth must belong to us Jews, the Goyim being mere excrement of animals must possess nothing.” In the Zohar (cabalistic commentary on the Torah) Vayshlah 177b states, “The Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful. All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. A Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality if profitable to himself or to Jews in general.” In a letter written in 1879 to brother freemason Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx (author of the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital), rabid talmudist Baruch Levy notoriously declared, “The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of the races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order, the ‘Children of Israel’ will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled in which it is said that when the messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands (published in the Rothschild controlled La Revue de Paris, June 1st 1928).

​

It is no coincidence that the Noahide code (in which the rabbinical commentary asserts there are eight genders including male and female) and so-called gay pride are symbolized by a rainbow flag. That flag flies outside the United Nations headquarters in New York City and from the rooftops of United States (and many other countries') embassies and consulate buildings all over the world. Formally ratified by the majority of UN member states, the Noahide code, the quasi-theocratic foundation of the New World Order has been established as the ultimate system of universal legal arbitration, superceding without exception all other forms of national and international jurisprudence. On March 26th 1991 the US Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation that was passed by both houses. Congress and the president George Bush (senior) indicated in Public Law 102-114, 102nd Congress that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah and that these laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.

 

In his book Judaism’s Strange Gods Michael A. Hoffman writes, “Under the Talmud counterfeit Noahide Law the worship of Jesus is forbidden under penalty of death since such worship of Christ is condemned by Judaism as idolatry. Meanwhile, various forms of incest are permitted under the Talmud understanding of the Noahide code (Enziklopediya Talmudit, note 1, pp. 351-352). US presidents and Congress urged the adoption of Noahide Law as interpreted by Chabad Lubavitch Grand Rabbi Schneerson. The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a world order immediately preceding the universal reign of the Talmud. Maimónides ruled that it is a Jewish court or a court appointed by Jewish authority that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimónides also decreed that any non-Jewish nation 'not subject to our jurisdiction' (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war. Furthermore, all non-Jews would have the legal status of ger toshav (‘resident alien’, cf. Alan Unterman, Dictionary of Jewish Lore and Legend [London: Thames and Hudson, 1991], p. 148), even in their own land; as for example in occupied Palestine where newly arrived Khazars from Russia have an automatic right to housing and citizenship, while two million Palestinian refugees who either fled or were expelled by the Israelis are forbidden the right of return. Resident alien status has been clearly delineated in scholarly articles in leading Jewish publications. For example, Hebrew University professor Mordechai Nisan, basing his exposition on Maimónides stated that 'a non-Jew permitted to reside in a land ruled by Jewish law must accept paying a tax and suffering the humiliation of servitude. If Gentiles refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this signals their rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence.' [cf. Mordechai Nisan, Kivunim (official publication of the World Zionist Organization), August 1984, pp. 151-156].”

​

In a private meeting with US president Woodrow Wilson (a high ranking crypto freemason whose term in office ran from 1913 until 1921), Colonel Edward Mandell-House, Harvard professor of law, 33rd degree freemason and long-standing senior asset of the Rothschild international banking cartel (who prior to being  appointed chief political adviser to the president was an executive officer at Warburg Brothers bank on Wall Street) confidently asserted, “Soon every american will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and it will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every american will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of the law merchant (Maritime Admiralty Law) under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and if by accident one or two would figure it out we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every american a contributor to this fraud which we will call Social Insurance. Without realizing it, every american will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner every american will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office of the president of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.”

​

Mandell-House lobbied hard for the creation of a central bank independent of government control during his time as an executive officer at Warburg Brothers bank. Sponsored by president Wilson the US Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Mandell-House was instrumental in the subsequent selection of the Federal Reserve’s board of directors. Under the terms of the charter the central bank, slated to guarantee liquidity of the entire United States banking system assumed exclusive rights to issue dollar currency for circulation as US ‘legal tender’ (which was and still is not redeemable for gold or silver). Only political conspiracy can explain how a criminal cabal of freemasons could conjure money from the ether then lend it to the US government and the rest of the world at interest. Almost before the ink on the charter of the Federal Reserve was dry the cartel board judiciously extended a generous line of credit to the United States government in support of what amounted to an undeclared and officially unsanctioned fiscal programme of continuous budget deficit finance. This was the lamentable beginning of the federal government’s permanent state of indebtedness to the privately owned and controlled US central bank. A massive new stream of revenue was required in order to service what would become ever spiralling interest repayments due on the line of credit. However, the US government had stealthily introduced universal ‘income tax’ months in advance of the passing of the Federal Reserve Act for that very reason and tasked the Internal Revenue Service (the operation of which has never received congressional ratification and is therefore illegal) to collect (some will rightly say extort) it.

​

In 1913 Warburg Brothers bank was pre-eminent among the twelve member board of the newly chartered Federal Reserve. Thirty seven years later at a senate committee hearing in Washington DC Paul Warburg the managing director of Warburg Brothers bank and grandson of its founder told the committee members, “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” In a parallel universe on the day the Federal Reserve Act lapsed, a United States government plan to permanently default on servicing the fictional multi-trillion dollar national debt and withdraw Federal Reserve ‘legal tender’ from circulation, replacing it with interest free US treasury issued dollar currency would have been the single most talked about subject among americans (if not the whole world) who for months since learning of the coming change and impatient for the historic day to arrive would have been happily anticipating the long overdue demise of the Federal Reserve. On that day americans in their millions would take to the streets of towns and cities all over the United States in wild celebration of their good fortune and high hopes for the future after suffering four generations of criminal usury at the hands of the thieves at the Federal Reserve and their irredeemably corrupt political proxies within the United States government. Predictably in the real world americans had more ‘important’ things on their minds that day and so did practically everyone else in the world who also did not spill out of their homes to dance in the streets. On the 25th of September 2013 the Federal Reserve’s fifth consecutive twenty year US government license to issue and supply ‘legal tender’ expired. In the absence of any serious congressional opposition or public protest against the legislation (just like on each of the four previous occasions the license was up for renewal) the United States government discreetly rubber stamped the Federal Reserve’s license to counterfeit US dollar currency for another generation.

​

The great swindle of ‘fractional reserve lending’ is the miraculous creation of money (credit) when loans are extended by clearing banks to borrowers. The concept is arcane and counter intuitive. Before the loan principal is borowed (like the debt it later becomes) it literally does not exist and the extra money necessary to pay the interest on the loan principal after it is created will never exist. The total amount of money circulating throughout the economy, no matter how much that may be is always less than the total amount of debt the economy supports. Clearing bank loans are not drawn on depositors’ funds, neither are they drawn on cash reserves generated by interest on loan repayments or any other streams of revenue. Clearing banks create by ‘legal fiction’ the money required to make loans in the amount of eight to ten times the value of deposits they hold, depending on the limit specified by the central bank of the country in which they are trading or block of countries as is the case with the European Central Bank. Much in the same vein, the Bank of International Settlements (better known as the 'central bank of central banks') in Basel, Switzerland is the overall controlling institution, promulgating fiscal policies favourable to the wider economic, political and social objectives of its owner, the Rothschild international banking cartel.

 

Loan principal does not exist until it is credited to a borrower’s account, however the money necessary to pay the interest subsequently due on it is never created. In this way default on loan repayments is induced throughout the system creating a continuous transfer of assets from debtors (borrowers) to banks as forfeited loan collateral in the form of houses, factories, businesses, land, farms and many other kinds of real wealth. The central bank issues the currency, sets the limit on how many more times the amount of deposits clearing banks are authorized to lend and it fixes interest rates. When banks want to make loans they buy the cash required from the central bank at a discounted price of less than one per cent of face value. Virtually free money. The central bank spends the money it receives on paper, printing, cash distribution, payroll, administrative overheads and associated running costs. When a borrower repays the loan principal plus the interest due on it settling a debt, the bank pays back the cash it bought from the central bank which withdraws it from circulation leaving the (clearing) bank with the interest (cash) generated by the loan. The banks recover the cost of the ‘new money’ they buy from the central bank by deducting that sum from the interest (cash) their loans generate leaving the balance outstanding as gross profit.

 

The day the United States government incorporated the Federal Reserve it entered into a hundred year long criminal conspiracy with an international freemasonic syndicate of counterfeiters to impoverish and demoralize the people of America. Ever since that time US banks have been fleecing borrowers (not only americans) by extending interest bearing loans, money they never had, do not have now and which does not exist until they lend it. It is a testament to the enduring power of the cabalist matrix of deception that the racket of debt (money) creation cannot be counted among the causes of violent rebellion and the subsequent execution of any number of despotic kings, presidents and potentates who throughout history have paid with their lives for committing crimes less egregious than ‘fractional reserve lending’.

​

Thirteen years after the establishment of the US Federal Reserve, Montagu Norman, Knight of the Garter, 33rd degree freemason and longest serving governor of the Bank of England did not mince his words while disclosing the iniquitous character and objectives of the New World Order in a disturbing speech he gave to delegates attending the International Banker’s Conference in New York city. Norman spoke with the insufferable arrogance of a man who knew without a shadow of doubt that he would never be brought to book for his sorry part in an ancient worldwide conspiracy against God and humanity. To be sure, his despicable and unbridled hubris was not wasted on his confederates when he said, “Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished.”

 

Josiah Stamp, a director of the Bank of England from 1928 until his death in 1941 was reputed to be the second richest man in England. He broke ranks with the Rothschild cabal, publicly repudiating the creation of money as debt saying, “The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”

​

Known as the Banker’s Manifesto, US Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session 1934 states, “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere ‘user’ and use must be in acceptance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” The articles of incorporation of the International Monetary Fund (established jointly by the governments of the United States, Britain and France) were adopted at Bretton Woods in New Hampshire on the 22nd of July 1944. In Sections 1 to 9 of Article IX the charter states, “The Fund shall possess full juridical personality. Shall have immunity from judicial process. Property and assets of the Fund, wherever located and by whomever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation, or any other form of seizure by (government) executive or legislative action. The archives shall be held inviolable. All property and assets shall be free from restrictions, regulations, controls, and moratoria of any nature. The officers and personnel shall be immune from legal processes, immigration restrictions, alien registration requirements, and national service obligations; shall be immune from taxation and customs duties, immune from liability for taxes and duties. No taxation of any kind shall be levied on any obligation or security, dividend or interest of the Fund.”

 

The worldwide brotherhood of freemasons role in the perpetration of probably the most audacious and incredible hoax in recorded history cannot be understated. Notwithstanding the massive financial and human resources available to NASA, after fifty years stolidly working to maintain the deception, continuing to do so is proving to be beyond the ‘space’ agency’s ability. NASA is suffering a hidden crisis. The sheer weight of historical, political, cultural and especially ‘scientific’ fabrications accumulated since the staging of the Apollo moon landings by NASA is threatening to bring the whole house down. Established shortly after the end of World War Two, thick with american freemasons and their ‘de-nazified’ Thule Society brothers of the ‘craft’, all ex-military scientists and engineers led by Wernher von Braun (33rd degree freemason and ex-SS officer credited with inventing the V2 rocket-propelled long range missile for Germany and the Apollo programme’s Saturn Five rocket) who were secretly transported to the United States by the Department of Defence in order to exploit their unparalleled expertise in rocket and jet engine technology developed for the German military. The technology dictates that rocket engines burn liquid or solid fuel in air to generate propulsive thrust. The super-heated gases produced by the combustion process are drawn under pressure through expansion chambers (instantaneously amplifying the explosive power), before being expelled in a continuous blast via exhausts. Ambient air acts as a fulcrum offering atmospheric resistance to engine thrust, thus the rocket is propelled through a trajectory in the opposite direction. Paradoxically, 'scientific' orthodoxy postulates that 'space' is a cosmic vacuum, frozen, limitless and devoid of atmosphere. If that is the case, rocket engines are worse than useless as a means of spacecraft propulsion, because the absence of an atmosphere predicates the absence of a fulcrum. Moreover, without air combustion is impossible.

 

The reason why NASA would go to such extraordinary lengths to plan, execute and subsequently attempt to permanently maintain the deception of the faked moon landings has long since become clear. Prior to the staging of the hoax no photographs, video or film footage of the (spherical) Earth existed. The ‘scientific’ establishment, the military, the government of the United States and a slew of powerful american (and international) institutions and corporations with a vested interest in the consolidation of what was already the ubiquitously held belief that the Earth is one of eight planets which as they rotate, orbit the sun in the frozen vacuum of ‘space’. A photograph taken from ‘space’ of the Earth would constitute proof that it is a planet and by extension confirm the existence of the heliocentric solar system, the cosmological foundation of cabalism and freemasonry. The original photographs produced by NASA depicting a spherical Blue Earth suspended in the darkness of ‘space’ have like the rest of the surviving photographs, video and film footage of the Apollo missions to the moon been irrefutably exposed as fake. The photographs, video and film footage of the moon walks (infamous for being enacted on a soudstage) have aged badly and in comparison with current computer generated images are primitive and thoroughly unconvincing. Furthermore, specimens of so-called moon rock have proven to be of terrestrial origin.

​

Without exception (China’s Mars mission is a blatant hoax) every national ‘space’ agency is party to this ongoing deception while the glamourous private and ostensibly independent ‘space’ ventures most famously sponsored by Elon Musk and Richard Branson have been fabricated to reinforce it. The marketing campaign video of the Red Bull high altitude (balloon) skydive was a typical example of the use of a ‘fish eye’ camera lens which produces convex (or concave) curvature of the horizon. Just before the jump and prior to the mounting of a ‘fish eye’ camera lens by the Red Bull skydiver the flat horizon of the Earth is clearly visible through the open hatch of the capsule. Even a cursory examination of the many and varied images of Planet Earth competing for every inch of screen space on the NASA website (and those of its international counterparts) reveals that without exception they are computer generted images (as NASA has been forced to concede), not photographs. It is worth repeating that no photogragh, video or film footage exists of the Earth in its entirety. No genuine photographic image depicting the Earth as a globe, sphere, ball, oblate spheroid or anything else exists. There is no definitive photograph of 'Planet Earth' and neither NASA nor any other ‘space’ agency has produced one because none have ever been taken.

 

The claims made by so-called astrophysicists for the existence of ‘black holes’ and ‘dark matter’ are bogus. Likewise, the equally ridiculous story of the Big Bang. Atoms are a pseudo-scientific invention and ipso facto have never been split. The theories of gravity and relativity and much more besides hang in the balance since empirical evidence of their veracity is still not forthcoming from the international ‘scientific’ establishment that any of these reputed cosmic phenomena are anything more than science fiction, calculated deceptions conjured to support and give credence to the heliocentric paradigm. Clearly, this is not a case of the erroneous application of the scientific method, but rather the wholesale rejection of it in favour of the arcane dogma of cabalistic metaphysics (essentially the substitution of superstition for science), the adherents of which are prepared to go to any lengths not to let the surfeit of contradicting facts get in the way of their quasi-religious beliefs.

​

In 1921 world famous theoretical physicist Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics for his General Theory of Relativity (published in 1919). In a lecture he gave to the students and teaching faculty (of which he became a member in 1940) of Princeton University in the United States Einstein solemnly asserted, “What we mean by relative motion in a general sense is perfectly plain to everyone. If we think of a wagon moving along a street we know that it is possible to speak of the wagon at rest and the street in motion, just as well as it is to speak of the wagon in motion and the street at rest. That however is a very special part of the ideas involved in the principle of relativity.” Einstein was not joking when he made that patently ridiculous claim, but had anyone in the audience openly laughed, they could not have been blamed for thinking he was.

 

Nikola Tesla, experimental physicist and electrical engineer, the inventor of revolutionary wireless technology (later suppressed) with the capacity to tap into and transmit the latent electromagnetic (free) energy in the ionosphere to ground based receivers emigrated from Croatia to the United States in 1884 where he was initially employed at the Eddison Machine Works in New York. Four years later the patents he registered for his alternating current induction motor and polyphase system for conducting electricity (now universal) were licensed to Westinghouse Electric. Tesla condemned the ‘scientific’ establishment saying, “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” Tesla did not pull his rhetorical punches when in 1935 he said, “Einstein’s relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” Einstein’s mathematically false formulae cut no ice with Ernest Rutherford the ‘father’ of nuclear physics (after whom the chemical element 104 was named rutherfordium) who dismissed the theory of relativity as “nonsense.”

​

The unravelling of the hoax of the Apollo ‘space’ programme continues a pace as NASA offers up fake photographs of ‘deep space’, supposedly taken by the Hubble telescope. The image of what NASA claims is a photograph of the arrid desert-like terrain of the surface of Mars, purported to have been taken by the Mars Lander in 2015 in which a groundhog is clearly visible among rocks in the background has become notorious. That this discredited, cack-handed sepia tinted (intended to provide the appropriate colouring for the ‘red planet’) fake photograph alone has not made NASA a worldwide laughing stock is sadly a measure of the boundless credulity of the people of the world and their blind belief in the lies served up to them by a cabalistic priesthood of ‘scientists’ whose contempt for the truth is only equalled by that which they feel for the people they lie to. If they existed, the International Space Station and any number of the alleged five thousand Earth-orbiting satellites could not only take photographs proving the Earth is a planet, but could also transmit a continuous live video stream as they orbit, but they do not. The burning question then is why not? Television news interviews of crew members inside the International Space Station have repeatedly been exposed as staged, nevertheless the major television networks worldwide (all of which are knowingly complicit in the deception) continue to broadcast these enactments as real events. 'Astronauts' from around the world, people who claim to be physicists, biologists, engineers, chemists, mathematicians and other assorted ‘scientists’ (all of them freemasons) arrogantly perjur themselves as they play their roles, lying repeatedly to gullible television audiences of millions during fake video link-ups.

​

In Orwell’s novel 1984, deep in the bowels of the Ministry of Love, O’Brien, a criminally insane member of the elite ruling minority tortures the ‘socially delinquent’ protagonist Winston Smith with electric shocks while cruelly schooling him in the ways of the world.

  “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me? The second thing for you to realize is that power is power over human beings. Over the body, but above all, over the mind. Power over matter, external reality as you would call it is not important. Already our control over matter is absolute.”

  “But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach forever.”

  “What are the stars? They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it."

​

​